Did the EPC Rescind Its Old Position Paper on Homosexuality?
The question of whether the EPC rescinded its old Position Paper on Homosexuality, and if so, when this happened, was an item of debate at this year’s General Assembly. This question is unfortunately complicated by the unique combination of the EPC’s traditions, culture, and parliamentary rules. I’m going to address the procedural question first, and then provide some comments on the contents of the Position Paper on Homosexuality.
The EPC has two kinds of documents it produces from time-to-time. The first is Position Papers. Act of Assembly 05-03 (2005) defines Position Papers,
A Position Paper is intended to set forth the mind of the General Assembly of the Evangelical Presbyterian Church on a subject of compelling interest because of developments in the church or the culture at large. A Position Paper is intended to enable the Evangelical Presbyterian Church to make a definitive statement to itself, the Christian community, and the world. It is not intended to be an exhaustive theological statement nor a complete exegetical biblical study on a particular issue. A Position Paper must be adopted by one Assembly as a Preliminary Paper, subject to revision and discussion, and must be adopted or withdrawn by the act of another Assembly. While stating the definitive position of the mind of the General Assembly, a Position Paper does not have the status of a Constitutional document nor is it to be regarded as binding on the conscience of churches or individuals.
This definition is a refinement of a process that was established by Act of Assembly 84-09 (1984). The second kind of document is Pastoral Letters…
A Summary of Actions Taken by the 46th General Assembly of the Evangelical Presbyterian Church
This week my denomination, the Evangelical Presbyterian Church, held its 46th stated General Assembly in Denver, Colorado. This is the annual meeting and council (synod) of my church, and every pastor has a right to attend and every congregation may send elder representatives. Due to the subject of same-sex attraction and ordination, this was the most intense and contentious assembly in recent EPC history, if not its most divided assembly ever. More on that towards the bottom. But there was quite a lot of other things going on at the assembly, and below is a summary of the official actions taken.
To amend the EPC’s constitution requires a majority vote of one assembly, a majority vote of three-fourths of the presbyteries over the next year, and then a majority vote of the subsequent assembly. The GA completed that amendment process in four areas that essentially cleaned up and standardized language related to the ordination process.
The EPC’s formal ecumenical relationships are called “fraternal partnerships” and are aimed at increasing cooperation on mission, church planting, theology, and education. The EPC entered into a fraternal partnership with the The Evangelical Church of Egypt (Synod of the Nile), which is a wonderful development….
A Summary of Actions Taken by the 45th General Assembly of the EPC
This week my denomination, the Evangelical Presbyterian Church, held its 45th stated General Assembly in Detroit, Michigan. This is the annual meeting and council (synod) of my church, and every pastor has a right to attend and every congregation may send elder representatives. This was a quiet assembly, and in many ways an archetype of EPC gatherings. Lots of things went on at the assembly, but below is a summary of its official actions.
To amend the EPC’s constitution requires a majority vote of one assembly, a majority vote of three-fourths of the presbyteries over the next year, and then a majority vote of the subsequent assembly. The GA completed that amendment process to clarify how presbyteries deal with transitional pastors (interim pastors) who are ordained in other denominations, want to maintain their ordination in their home denominations, but still want to temporarily serve an EPC congregation in a transitional role…
Review, Control, and Synods: The Church’s Connection
The great Cappadocian church father Gregory of Nazianzus, who chaired the Council on Constantinople which settled the Nicene Creed, said “I saw the end of not even one synod as being useful”. Replace “synod” with “presbytery” and you get the idea. Herman Bavinck relays a proverb, “Every [church] council gives birth to [further] battles.” To riff on Ecclesiastes: Of meetings there is no end.
I was asked to speak on that exciting topic of “review and control” and Westminster Confession of Faith 31, “On Synods and Councils”. This risks significant boredom in our listener, or alternatively, perhaps the polity nerds are the ones already here. Yet the subject of review and control has great relevance to the ministry and mission of the church
“Review and control” is a phrase used in the EPC’s constitution and throughout American Presbyterianism, and means that higher church courts (presbyteries to sessions, general assemblies/synods to presbyteries) have the right and responsibility to review the actions of their subordinate courts and to correct them if necessary. This relationship has a confessional basis. WCF 31.2 states…
A Summary of Actions Taken by the 44th General Assembly of the EPC
This week my denomination, the Evangelical Presbyterian Church, held its 44th stated General Assembly in Memphis, Tennessee. This is the annual meeting and council (synod) of my church, and every pastor has a right to attend and every congregation may send elder representatives. This was a busy and lively assembly. Many things went on at the assembly, but below is a summary of its official actions.
To amend the EPC’s constitution requires a majority vote of one assembly, a majority vote of three-fourths of the presbyteries over the next year, and then a majority vote of the subsequent assembly. The assembly completed this process for an area that is essentially cleaning up language. The Book of Government places the authority over a local church’s budget in the hands of the Session (board of elders). The GA voted to delete a section from the BoG on the grounds of redundancy and to clarify that a church’s financial and budgetary authority are always vested with the Session unless the Session delegates otherwise. The GA also completed the amendment process for part of the Book of Discipline to include this line: “Church discipline does not supersede or negate the legal responsibility to report cases of suspected abuse to civil authorities according to local and state requirements.” This is part of the denomination’s ongoing work of proactively addressing abuse in the church…
